Planning how to distribute your resources, in our case mainly time, is important in a project so
this section will display how we planned to use our time, how we actually spent our time and on
which parts of the project we spent the time.

\subsection{Personnel time}

Starting the project we made an estimation for spending 80 hours as the course prescribed distributed
over the weeks with some spikes on the weeks before a deadline. In reality it panned out almost as
we planned but we spent more time on the spikes than we though and less time in between. This was
mostly because our members had to do work for other projects and had problems with dedicating time
to the project when we did not have a deadline looming over us. The result in project time spent
is shown in figure \ref{times1}.

\begin{figure}[h!]
\begin{center}
  \includegraphics[scale=0.7]{img/times.png}
  \caption{How much time the project team spent distributed over the weeks compared to planned time}
\label{times1}
\end{center}
\end{figure}

Initially we had planned that each member would spend an equal amount of time on the project but due to
various circumstances the distribution between members got a bit uneven. However all members spent at
least 80 hours on the project. Individual time spent is displayed in figure \ref{times2}.

\begin{figure}[h!]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[scale=0.7]{img/times2.png}
\caption{Individual time spent on the project compared to planned time}
\label{times2}
\end{center}
\end{figure}

The time spent over the weeks for each member differed quite much as well mainly during spike weeks
as is displayed in figure \ref{times3}.

\begin{figure}[h!]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[scale=0.7]{img/times3.png}
\caption{Individual time spent on each week compared to planned time}
\label{times3}
\end{center}
\end{figure}

\subsection{Action time}
The time spent for our project was far over 80 hours per person with the biggest factor being problems with
reqT which will be discussed later in this report. As shown in figure \ref{times4}, \ref{times5} and 
\ref{times6} at least 30\% of each hand-in have been spent on making sure reqT provided the right output.
These figures also show a trend of elicitation and specification dwindling towards the end of the project
which falls quite naturally since more time should be spent on finalizing the requirements document
instead of creating new requirements.

\begin{figure}[h!]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[scale=0.7]{img/times4.png}
\caption{Time spent on different actions for RD version 1}
\label{times4}
\end{center}
\end{figure}

\begin{figure}[h!]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[scale=0.7]{img/times5.png}
\caption{Time spent on different actions for RD version 2}
\label{times5}
\end{center}
\end{figure}

\begin{figure}[h!]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[scale=0.7]{img/times6.png}
\caption{Time spent on different actions for RD version 3}
\label{times6}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
